Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 1764 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-6400 - 195 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $99.95 vs $283.35
- Up to 62% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900KF - $0.55 vs $1.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
195
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
37.931034482758626%
Price, $
$283.35
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $283.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348549 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
181
92.82051282051282%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348550 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1111
63.01758366420873%
Multi-Core
3023
33.02381472580293%
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |