Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 2321 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than FX-9590 - 124 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 165 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - $298.02 vs $827.21
- Up to 60% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-10920X - $2.66 vs $6.67 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.67/FPS
39.880059970015%
Price, $
$827.21
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $827.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348908 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
112
90.32258064516128%
Value, $/FPS
$2.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348907 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | FX |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |