Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 614 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 19% better in Starfield than Ryzen 5 2400G - 63 vs 53 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - $135.0 vs $827.21
- Up to 81% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-10920X - $2.55 vs $13.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
63
100%
Value, $/FPS
$13.13/FPS
19.421172886519418%
Price, $
$827.21
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $827.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349460 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
53
84.12698412698413%
Value, $/FPS
$2.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$135
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349461 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
1057
63.104477611940304%
Multi-Core
3294
29.024583663758925%
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |