Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 104 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 8% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Ryzen 5 3400G - 147 vs 136 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - $132.0 vs $827.21
- Up to 83% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i9-10920X - $0.97 vs $5.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
147
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.63/FPS
17.2291296625222%
Price, $
$827.21
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $827.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349403 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
136
92.51700680272108%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$132
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $132 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349403 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1128
67.34328358208955%
Multi-Core
3619
31.88827209445766%
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |