Buy on Amazon
$1,200
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $499
Availability
MSRP in USD: $499
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10980XE on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 262 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10980XE.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10980XE
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 36 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 9% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-10980XE - 62 vs 57 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-10980XE - $450.0 vs $1200.0
- Up to 66% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-10980XE - $7.26 vs $21.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-10980XE - 105 vs 165 Watts
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10980XE
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
57
91.93548387096774%
Value, $/FPS
$21.05/FPS
34.489311163895486%
Price, $
$1200
37%
Intel Core i9 i9-10980XE Octadeca-core (18 Core) 3 GHz Processor - 24.75 MB Cache - 4.60 GHz Overclocking Speed - 14 nm - 165 W - 36 Threads
Buy for $1,200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348797 minutes ago
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
62
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$450
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-core, 24-Threads Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for $450 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348797 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10980XE
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10980XE | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Cascade Lake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 12 |
36 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
