Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10980XE outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10980XE is 1019 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10980XE
- Performs up to 12% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3930 - 134 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 36 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-10980XE - $98.02 vs $1200.0
- Up to 91% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-10980XE - $0.82 vs $8.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i9-10980XE - 51 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10980XE doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.96/FPS
9.151785714285712%
Price, $
$1200
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350202 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
120
89.55223880597015%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
38.726114649681534%
Multi-Core
1043
8.702544847726324%
Intel Core i9-10980XE | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Celeron |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 2 |
36 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |