Buy on Amazon
$1,200
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10980XE outperforms the cheaper Core i9-9920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-9920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10980XE is 365 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-9920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10980XE
- Performs up to 0% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i9-9920X - 218 vs 217 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9920X - 36 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i9-10980XE - $595.0 vs $1200.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i9-10980XE - $2.74 vs $5.5 per FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-10980XE
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
218
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.5/FPS
49.81818181818182%
Price, $
$1200
49%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9 i9-10980XE Octadeca-core (18 Core) 3 GHz Processor - 24.75 MB Cache - 4.60 GHz Overclocking Speed - 14 nm - 165 W - 36 Threads
Buy for $1,200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351468 minutes ago
Core i9-9920X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
217
99.54128440366972%
Value, $/FPS
$2.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$595
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i9-9920X X-Series Processor 12 Cores up to 4.4GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W Processors (999AC6)
Buy for $595 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351468 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-10980XE
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Core i9-9920X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10980XE | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i9 |
| Cascade Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 12 |
36 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
