Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-6700T - 203 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $99.9 vs $270.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-11900 - $0.55 vs $1.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
203
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
41.35338345864662%
Price, $
$270
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348545 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
182
89.65517241379311%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348546 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1183
55.539906103286384%
Multi-Core
3566
40.4491833030853%
Intel Core i9-11900 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |