Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $99.9 vs $225.99
- Up to 53% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700F - $0.55 vs $1.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-6700T - 191 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
182
95.28795811518324%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348545 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
46.610169491525426%
Price, $
$225.99
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348545 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1183
73.38709677419355%
Multi-Core
3566
49.315447379338956%
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |