Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 1750 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-6800K - 142 vs 134 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $108.0 vs $270.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-11900 - $0.81 vs $1.9 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.9/FPS
42.631578947368425%
Price, $
$270
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349103 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
134
94.36619718309859%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1224
57.46478873239437%
Multi-Core
5661
64.2127949183303%
Intel Core i9-11900 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |