Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 482 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 55% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Athlon 3000G - 471 vs 303 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $63.83 vs $240.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-11900F - $0.21 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
471
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
41.17647058823529%
Price, $
$240
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361152 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
303
64.3312101910828%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
44.081068631966836%
Multi-Core
1975
21.53527423399847%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Athlon |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |