Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1314 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 24% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 657 vs 530 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $240.0 vs $270.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.37 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 24 vs 16 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
657
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$240
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350296 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
530
80.6697108066971%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
72.54901960784314%
Price, $
$270
88%
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350297 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
54.076462459695996%
Multi-Core
6976
76.06585977537891%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |