Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2844 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670S.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 54% better in FIFA 23 than Core i5-4670S - 219 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $55.26 vs $240.0
- Up to 65% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i9-11900F - $0.39 vs $1.1 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
219
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
35.45454545454545%
Price, $
$240
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361988 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
142
64.84018264840182%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$55.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $55.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361989 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1151
53.017042837402116%
Multi-Core
3254
35.48140878857268%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i5-4670S |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |