Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2844 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $55.26 vs $198.9
- Up to 69% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-11600K - $0.47 vs $1.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-4670S - 130 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 12 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
118
90.76923076923077%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$55.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $55.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348794 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.53/FPS
30.71895424836601%
Price, $
$198.9
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $198.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348794 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1151
52.65324794144556%
Multi-Core
3254
37.929828651357965%
Intel Core i5-4670S | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |