Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1750 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-6800K - 164 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $108.0 vs $240.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-11900F - $0.69 vs $1.46 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.46/FPS
47.26027397260274%
Price, $
$240
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350359 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
157
95.73170731707317%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, $
$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350360 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1224
56.379548595117456%
Multi-Core
5661
61.727183513248285%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |