Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1750 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 12% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-6900K - 144 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $145.0 vs $240.0
- Up to 33% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-11900F - $1.12 vs $1.67 per FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
144
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.67/FPS
67.06586826347306%
Price, $
$240
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350190 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
129
89.58333333333334%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$145
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1252
57.66927683095348%
Multi-Core
7118
77.6142187329626%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |