Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900F is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-10900 - 164 vs 161 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $240.0 vs $299.98
- Up to 22% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-10900 - $1.46 vs $1.86 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$240
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350228 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
161
98.17073170731707%
Value, $/FPS
$1.86/FPS
78.49462365591397%
Price, $
$299.98
80%
Buy for $299.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1704
78.48917549516352%
Multi-Core
8421
91.82204775924109%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |