Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 294 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - $240.0 vs $458.0
- Up to 44% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-12900 - $0.37 vs $0.66 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 6% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-11900F - 697 vs 657 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
657
94.26111908177906%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$240
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350301 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
697
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
56.060606060606055%
Price, $
$458
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for $458 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350301 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
2171
87.78811160533765%
Multi-Core
9171
70.3081876724931%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |