Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900F is 895 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 21% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 657 vs 542 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $240.0 vs $530.0
- Up to 62% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.37 vs $0.98 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 24 vs 16 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
657
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$240
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350300 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
542
82.49619482496195%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
37.755102040816325%
Price, $
$530
45%
Buy for $530 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350300 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
58.68263473053892%
Multi-Core
7454
81.2779413368226%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |