Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 1062 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 2700 - 209 vs 181 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $185.0 vs $265.0
- Up to 20% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-11900K - $1.02 vs $1.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
209
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
80.31496062992126%
Price, $
$265
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348675 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
181
86.60287081339713%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348676 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1114
46.98439477013918%
Multi-Core
5489
50.13701132626964%
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |