Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i9-11900K vs Ryzen 7 2700

Core i9-11900K vs Ryzen 7 2700: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-11900K

3.5 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i9-11900K Logo
Intel Core i9-11900K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.3 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 500 Series & Select 400 Chipset) 125W

Buy for $265 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 348675 minutes ago

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

3.2 GHz | 8-core

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Logo
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Processor with Wraith Spire LED Cooler - YD2700BBAFBOX

Buy for $185 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 348676 minutes ago

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-11900K

3.5 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i9-11900K Logo
Intel Core i9-11900K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.3 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 500 Series & Select 400 Chipset) 125W

Buy for $265 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 348675 minutes ago

vs

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

3.2 GHz | 8-core

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Logo
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Processor with Wraith Spire LED Cooler - YD2700BBAFBOX

Buy for $185 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 348676 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 1062 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.

Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K

  • Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 2700 - 209 vs 181 FPS
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700

  • Up to 30% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $185.0 vs $265.0
  • Up to 20% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-11900K - $1.02 vs $1.27 per FPS
  • Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
This is a free version of Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0.

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Extreme

Intel Core i9-11900K Logo
Core i9-11900K

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021


FPS

209

100%

Value, $/FPS

$1.27/FPS

80.31496062992126%

Price, $

$265

69%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-11900K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.3 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 500 Series & Select 400 Chipset) 125W

Buy for $265 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 348675 minutes ago

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Logo
Ryzen 7 2700

Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018


FPS

181

86.60287081339713%

Value, $/FPS

$1.02/FPS

100%

Price, $

$185

100%

Value Winner

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Processor with Wraith Spire LED Cooler - YD2700BBAFBOX

Buy for $185 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 348676 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Extreme

Intel Core i9-11900K Logo
Core i9-11900K

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Logo
Ryzen 7 2700

Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i9-11900K Logo
Core i9-11900K

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021


Single-Core

2371

100%

Multi-Core

10948

100%

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Logo
Ryzen 7 2700

Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018


Single-Core

1114

46.98439477013918%

Multi-Core

5489

50.13701132626964%

Intel Core i9-11900K Logo

Intel Core i9-11900K

vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 2700

Mar 16th, 2021
Release DateApr 19th, 2018
Core i9CollectionRyzen 7
Rocket LakeCodenamePinnacle Ridge
Intel Socket 1200SocketAMD Socket AM4
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
8Cores8
16Threads16
3.5 GHz
Base Clock Speed3.2 GHz
5.3 GHz
Turbo Clock Speed4.1 GHz
125 WTDP
65 W
14 nmProcess Size
12 nm
35.0x
Multiplier32.0x
UHD Graphics 750
Integrated GraphicsNone
YesOverclockableYes

Builds Using Core i9-11900K or Ryzen 7 2700

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, 1920 x 1080, Extreme

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.