Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K and the cheaper Core i5-11500 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 6% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-11500 - 125 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11500 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $218.99 vs $265.0
- Up to 12% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-11900K - $1.86 vs $2.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.12/FPS
87.73584905660378%
Price, $
$265
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353881 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
118
94.39999999999999%
Value, $/FPS
$1.86/FPS
100%
Price, $
$218.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $218.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353881 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1996
84.18388865457614%
Multi-Core
7424
67.81147241505298%
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i5-11500 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |