Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 3% better in The Outer Worlds than Core i9-10900F - 214 vs 207 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $244.77 vs $265.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Core i9-11900K - $1.18 vs $1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280296 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
207
96%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280296 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |