Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 28% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i3-3220 - 264 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - $79.0 vs $240.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i9-11900KF - $0.38 vs $0.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
264
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
41.75824175824176%
Price, $
$240
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361182 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
206
78.03030303030303%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
22.658610271903324%
Multi-Core
1085
10.716049382716049%
Intel Core i9-11900KF | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |