Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $79.0 vs $198.9
- Up to 38% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i5-11600K - $0.56 vs $0.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 55% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-3220 - 220 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 12 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
142
64.54545454545455%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348915 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.9/FPS
62.22222222222222%
Price, $
$198.9
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $198.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348916 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
24.016468435498627%
Multi-Core
1085
12.647161673854763%
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |