Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3395 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Valheim than FX-9590 - 232 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 125 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $298.02 vs $531.86
- Up to 31% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-13900KF - $1.57 vs $2.29 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
232
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.29/FPS
68.5589519650655%
Price, $
$531.86
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for $531.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349045 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
190
81.89655172413794%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349045 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 220 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |