Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 9 7950X3D on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 99 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 214 vs 212 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $531.86 vs $591.89
- Up to 11% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $2.49 vs $2.79 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
214
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$531.86
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $531.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353681 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
212
99.06542056074767%
Value, $/FPS
$2.79/FPS
89.24731182795699%
Price, $
$591.89
89%
Buy for $591.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353681 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Single-Core
2918
98.15001681802893%
Multi-Core
19633
97.6717576239988%
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 120 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |