Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the more expensive Core i9-13900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 99 days older than the more expensive Core i9-13900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-13900 - 136 vs 131 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $531.86 vs $567.98
- Up to 10% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-13900 - $3.91 vs $4.34 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$531.86
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $531.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353736 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
131
96.32352941176471%
Value, $/FPS
$4.34/FPS
90.09216589861751%
Price, $
$567.98
93%
Buy for $567.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353736 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Single-Core
2714
91.28826101580894%
Multi-Core
16426
81.71732749614446%
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |