Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1874 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Valheim than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 232 vs 198 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $270.0 vs $531.86
- Up to 41% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-13900KF - $1.36 vs $2.29 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
232
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.29/FPS
59.388646288209614%
Price, $
$531.86
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for $531.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349039 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
198
85.34482758620689%
Value, $/FPS
$1.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349040 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
39.4887319206189%
Multi-Core
6976
34.70474105765882%
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |