Buy on Amazon
$400
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-750 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 2848 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 35% better in Starfield than Core i5-750 - 58 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-750 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - $75.0 vs $400.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-7900X - $1.74 vs $6.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 95 vs 140 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-7900X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
58
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.9/FPS
25.217391304347824%
Price, $
$400
18%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-7900X X-Series Processor 10 Cores up to 4.3 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 140W
Buy for $400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349337 minutes ago
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
43
74.13793103448276%
Value, $/FPS
$1.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$75
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-750 Quad-Core Desktop Processor (BX80605I5750) 8M Cache, 2.66 GHz, LGA1156
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349337 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-7900X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
427
30.028129395218002%
Multi-Core
1200
13.665869490946362%
Intel Core i9-7900X | vs | Intel Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
