Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 230 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 6% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen 5 2600 - 179 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 28 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-7940X - $155.0 vs $425.0
- Up to 61% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-7940X - $0.92 vs $2.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.37/FPS
38.81856540084388%
Price, $
$425
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $425 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348669 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
169
94.41340782122904%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$155
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $155 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348669 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1152
84.08759124087591%
Multi-Core
4841
48.78564950115892%
Intel Core i9-7940X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
28 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |