Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 230 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 2700 - 186 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 28 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i9-7940X - $185.0 vs $425.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-7940X - $1.02 vs $2.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
FPS
186
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.28/FPS
44.736842105263165%
Price, $
$425
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for $425 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348553 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
181
97.31182795698925%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348554 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1114
81.31386861313868%
Multi-Core
5489
55.3159326816487%
Intel Core i9-7940X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Skylake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
28 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |