Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7940X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1292 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7940X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 28 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-7940X - 204 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i9-7940X - $198.9 vs $425.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-7940X - $0.97 vs $2.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 125 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
FPS
186
91.17647058823529%
Value, $/FPS
$2.28/FPS
42.54385964912281%
Price, $
$425
46%
Buy for $425 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348552 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$198.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $198.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348552 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7940X | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
28 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |