Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-7940X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-7940X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 1852 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-7940X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $425.0 vs $593.77
- Up to 13% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-13600KF - $3.27 vs $3.76 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 28 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 22% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-7940X - 158 vs 130 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 125 vs 165 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
FPS
130
82.27848101265823%
Value, $/FPS
$3.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$425
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $425 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351036 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.76/FPS
86.96808510638299%
Price, $
$593.77
71%
FPS Winner
Buy for $593.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351035 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Single-Core
1370
49.87258827812159%
Multi-Core
9923
64.37236457995459%
Intel Core i9-7940X | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 14 |
28 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |