Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7960X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7960X is 494 days older than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7960X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-7960X - $112.0 vs $357.22
- Up to 69% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-7960X - $0.83 vs $2.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-7960X - 65 vs 165 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.65/FPS
31.32075471698113%
Price, $
$357.22
31%
Buy for $357.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349223 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349223 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7960X | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |