Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 2318 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-3220 - 138 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $79.0 vs $359.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-9900KF - $0.62 vs $2.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
138
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.6/FPS
23.846153846153843%
Price, $
$359
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $359 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349101 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
128
92.7536231884058%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |