Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 1286 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-6400 - 249 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $99.95 vs $359.0
- Up to 69% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-9900KF - $0.44 vs $1.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
249
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.44/FPS
30.555555555555557%
Price, $
$359
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $359 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349101 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
229
91.96787148594377%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1111
65.70076877587226%
Multi-Core
3023
37.53880541413138%
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |