Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF and the cheaper Core i5-9400F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-9400F - 125 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $112.0 vs $359.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-9900KF - $0.93 vs $2.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.87/FPS
32.40418118466899%
Price, $
$359
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $359 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349102 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
121
96.8%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Single-Core
1378
81.4902424600828%
Multi-Core
4834
60.0273190115485%
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |