Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 185 days older than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Core i7-10700F - 207 vs 204 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-9900KS - $225.99 vs $535.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-9900KS - $1.11 vs $2.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 65 vs 127 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
FPS
207
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.58/FPS
43.02325581395349%
Price, $
$535
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for $535 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348794 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
204
98.55072463768117%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348794 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1612
90.56179775280899%
Multi-Core
7231
84.12052117263843%
Intel Core i9-9900KS | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 28th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
127 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |