Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 379 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Starfield than Core i5-8400 - 58 vs 57 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 24 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $140.0 vs $595.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-9920X - $2.46 vs $10.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
58
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.26/FPS
23.976608187134506%
Price, $
$595
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $595 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349583 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
57
98.27586206896551%
Value, $/FPS
$2.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349584 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Single-Core
1353
95.75371549893843%
Multi-Core
4748
50.285956365176865%
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |