Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9940X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 1538 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9940X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 22% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-9940X - 161 vs 132 FPS
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - $591.89 vs $870.7
- Up to 44% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-9940X - $3.68 vs $6.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 120 vs 165 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9940X - 32 vs 28 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
132
81.98757763975155%
Value, $/FPS
$6.6/FPS
55.757575757575765%
Price, $
$870.7
67%
Buy for $870.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351218 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
161
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$591.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $591.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351217 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9940X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 16 |
28 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |