Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9940X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700F is 559 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9940X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 28 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-9940X - 191 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - $225.99 vs $870.7
- Up to 75% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-9940X - $1.18 vs $4.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
188
98.42931937172776%
Value, $/FPS
$4.63/FPS
25.48596112311015%
Price, $
$870.7
25%
Buy for $870.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350708 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350708 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9940X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
28 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |