Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700F is 994 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 10% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 584 vs 529 FPS
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $225.99 vs $788.88
- Up to 74% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.39 vs $1.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 32 vs 16 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
584
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350412 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
529
90.58219178082192%
Value, $/FPS
$1.49/FPS
26.174496644295303%
Price, $
$788.88
28%
Buy for $788.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350412 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
72.64267990074443%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |