Buy on Amazon
$870.7
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9940X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 559 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9940X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 28 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Dota 2 than Core i9-9940X - 215 vs 206 FPS
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - $244.77 vs $870.7
- Up to 73% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i9-9940X - $1.14 vs $4.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Core i9-9940X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
206
95.81395348837209%
Value, $/FPS
$4.23/FPS
26.95035460992907%
Price, $
$870.7
28%
Intel Core i9-9940X X-Series Processor 14 Cores up to 4.4GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W Processors (999AC9)
Buy for $870.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350745 minutes ago
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
215
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350745 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Core i9-9940X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9940X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 10 |
28 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
