Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9960X outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9960X is 1956 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9960X
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-9590 - 204 vs 192 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 165 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-9960X - $298.02 vs $1579.0
- Up to 80% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-9960X - $1.4 vs $6.97 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.97/FPS
20.086083213773314%
Price, $
$1579
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,579 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 352004 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
192
94.11764705882352%
Value, $/FPS
$1.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 352003 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9960X | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |