Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900HX outperforms Xeon E3-1280 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900HX is 3872 days newer than Xeon E3-1280 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900HX
- Performs up to 29% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 133 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1280 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i9-14900HX
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel BGA 1964 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 82 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
