Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 3409 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 87% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 252 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 8 vs 6 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i3-14100F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 85 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
