Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3048 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 135 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 71% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 87 vs 51 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
