Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E5540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 5036 days newer than Xeon E5540.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5540
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 80 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Xeon E5540 - 196 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5540 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5540 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5540
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5540 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Nehalem-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
