Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon W-3375 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 524 days newer than Xeon W-3375.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3375
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900F - 76 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon W-3375 - 152 vs 138 FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon W-3375
Server/Workstation • Jul 29th, 2021
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3375 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 29th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ice Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 4189 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
38 | Cores | 24 |
76 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 270 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
