Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon W-3375 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 532 days newer than Xeon W-3375.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3375
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 76 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 12% better in God of War than Xeon W-3375 - 201 vs 179 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3375 - 150 vs 270 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3375 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W-3375
Server/Workstation • Jul 29th, 2021
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3375 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 29th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ice Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 4189 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
38 | Cores | 24 |
76 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| 270 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
